Epson EcoTank 4700 vs 3760 [Which is Better?]

The EcoTank 4700 is a smaller variant that is perfect for home use and local work. The EcoTank 3760, on the other hand, is quite similar to the latest version but forgoes faxing in favor of a discounted rate. There are some basic differences between them which are as followed.


Printers with a small footprint, the Epson EcoTank 4700 and 3760 can both print, scan, and copy. Epson’s EcoTank machines, which are promoted as multitasking printers for households and local businesses, are created with this in mind.

They have a decent dimension and are constructed of polypropylene, so they should be accommodated in most offices. In terms of fashion, the 4700 and 3760 EcoTanks are more similar.  On the printer top, the eps 3760 is somewhat higher than the 4700, and both have indented buttons.

A 30-sheet motorized page feeding is included with each printer (ADF). Although the 4700 has a 250-sheet intake pad, the 3760 only has 150- and 100-sheet incoming sheet trays, Epson eco tank et 4700.

Comparison Chart

ModelEpson EcoTank 4700Epson EcoTank 3760
Type4-in-1 Wireless, cartridge-free3-in-1 Wireless, cartridge-free
Max. Print Resolution5760 x 1440 dpi4800 x 1200 optimized dpi
Print SpeedBlack: 10 ISO ppm
Color: 5 ISO ppm
Black: 15 ISO ppm
Color: 8 ISO ppm
Double-Sided Print Speedn/aBlack: 6.5 ISO ppm
Color: 4.5 ISO ppm
Auto Document FeederYesYes
Voice Activated PrintingYesYes
Scanner and CopierYesYes
Dimensions14.8″ x 22.8″ x 10.0″ (in use)16.4″ x 19.8″ x 10.0″ (in use)
Weight11 lbs16.1 lbs

Try out Epson 4700 vs 4760

Print speed and quality

Model EPS 4700 EPS 3760
Type  4-in-1 Wireless, cartridge-free 3-in-1 Wireless, cartridge-free
Print resolution  5760 x 1440 dpi 4800 x 1200 optimized dpi
Print speed Black: 10 ISO ppm

Colour: 5 ISO ppm

Black: 15 ISO ppm

Colour: 8 ISO ppm

Double-sided print speed              – Black: 6.5 ISO ppm

Colour: 4.5 ISO ppm

While the EcoTank 4700 prints quicker, Epson’s 3760 prints neatly. EcoTank 4760 and 3760 have identical output rates because of their similar look. Epson has a monochrome print speed of 15 print speed (ppm) and a color print speed of 8 ppm.

But in practice, both machines tend to outperform Epson’s estimate by roughly a page per minute in real-world usage The 4700, on the other hand, can print black-and-white pages at a rate of 10 pages per minute (ppm), and color papers at a rate of 5 ppm.

Epson’s EcoTanks aren’t built for increased printing, even though their figures are excellent for their classification and spectrum.

Connectivity and features

Connections possibilities are many for the Epson EcoTank 4700 and 3760, which are both vocal style printers. All of the Epson EcoTank 4700 and 3760 printers include regular connections. Both include a USB 2.0 connector, 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi, and WiFi Direct.

Additionally, these machines are equipped with an Ethernet connection, which is a more efficient and safe alternative for business environments. Unfortunately, similar to previous EcoTank versions, the devices do not have flash storage capabilities. For Android and iOS, the Epson iPrint application is interoperable with the 4700 and 3760 printers.

Printing budget

Replacement Ink Bottle Cost Page Yield Estimated Cost Per Print
EPS 4700 $13.99 (black) / $41.99 (multicolor) 4,500 (black) / 7,500 (colored) $0.003 / $0.005
EPS 3760 $19.99 (black) / $38.95 (multicolor) 7,500 (black) / 6,000 (colored) $0.002 / $0.006

Servicing expenses are a major selling feature for these AIOs. Epson’s EcoTank offers a lower cost per printing than comparable printers while being faster and costing less upfront. The EcoTank 4700 and 3760 use containers rather than cartridges, allowing you to print more pages per container and can save money overall.

Epson’s gated EcoFit containers are now used in both machines. 4700 has the cheapest black ink containers and the same cost for its colored ink. Black ink on the 3760 costs a little extra, but you’ll save money on colorful ink containers


Compared to the EcoTank 3760, it’s less expensive. If you’re looking for two-sided printing but don’t need faxing, this printer is a good option. The EcoTank 4700, on the other hand, would be enough for most individuals in a household.

Because this printer is the least expensive, it comes with certain compromises, such as the inability to print on both sides of the page and a reduced print rate. You can get away with buying this version if you just need to produce a few hundred documents at a time for business or your child’s education.

Andrew White

Written by Andrew White

Alexander White is an engineer who has been working in the printer industry for over 20 years. He is an author at printman reviews and his experience in printers will help you get fixes for your issues and great reviews!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.